The line graph depicts the average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the four countries between 1967 and 2007. Overall, it can be seen that the United Kingdom experienced the highest levels of carbon dioxide emissions in the year 1967, but it dropped gradually during the four decades; while Portugal had the lowest rates of carbon dioxide emissions in 1967. In addition, it should also be noted that both Italy and Portugal experienced the steadily increasing trends during the forty years’ period. In contrast, Sweden experienced a significantly increasing trend before the year of 1977, but it dropped hugely from 1977 to 2007.
With regards to the highest and lowest emission rates, it can be observed that United Kingdom began at roughly 10.5 tonnes of carbon dioxide emission rates in 1967, which was also the largest number compared to other three countries but it dropped to approximately 9 tonnes in 2007; while Portugal initially had the lowest emissions rates at about 1.8 tonnes, but it increased significantly and gradually to roughly 5.5 tonnes in 2007.
On the other hand, it is noticeable that Sweden experienced a considerably growing trend from roughly 8.5 to 10.5 tonnes between 1967 and 1977, which was also at its peak in 1977, but it decreased significantly and gradually after its peak to about 5 tonnes of emissions rates in the year 2007; while Italy had the gradually increasing trend, which started at approximately 4.2 to roughly 8 tonnes of emission rates during the forty years’ period.
- Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in groups, while others believe that it is better for them to study alone.Discuss both views and give your opinions. 78
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and mak 84
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Some people believe that students should take a wide range of courses. However, others believe that students would focus on the subject that they are good at or they are interested in. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
- As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work, job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbeing.What factors contribute to job satisfaction?How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line graph depicts the average carbo...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... it dropped hugely from 1977 to 2007. With regards to the highest and lowest e...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dually to roughly 5.5 tonnes in 2007. On the other hand, it is noticeable that...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1286.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 252.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10317460317 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69485059005 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.428571428571 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 377.1 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 42.0 22.4926829268 187% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 139.936493533 43.030603864 325% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 214.333333333 112.824112599 190% => OK
Words per sentence: 42.0 22.9334400587 183% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 5.23603664747 220% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217488902465 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146962732414 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115294907608 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16198011231 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0831966140141 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.6 13.2329268293 178% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.31 61.2550243902 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 10.3012195122 180% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.19 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.8 10.9970731707 171% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.