The line graph depicts the average carbon dioxide emissions in four countries between 1967 and 2007. Overall, It can be seen that the United Kingdom had the highest carbon dioxide emission rates among the four countries; while Portugal had the lowest emission levels of carbon dioxide in 1967. In addition, it can be observed that Italy and Portugal had the increasing trends gradually during these four decades.In contrast, United Kingdom dropped steadily; meanwhile Sweden experienced an increasing trend significantly from 1967 to 2007.
Increasing from approximately 9 metric tonnes in 1967 to 11 metric tonnes in 1977, Sweden’s rate then plunged to a low of just 6 metric tonnes in 2007.
Portugal in the begin with around just 1 metric tonnes in 1967.This was followed by a period of exponential growth to the 5 metic tonnes converged with Sweden in 2007. As it can be seen that Italy has a similar trend as Portugal, which increase gradually to the almost 7 metric tonnes sustained in this rage in the period from 1997 to 2007. It can be observed that United Kingdom began at roughly 11 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide was the highest that in the year of 1977, followed by a steady fall.
It is interesting notice that apparent that although the U.K. and Portugal had a reversed pattern, they sent out the highest and lowest amount of CO2 among four nations over the period in question.
- As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work, job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbeing.What factors contribute to job satisfaction?How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers? 84
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in groups, while others believe that it is better for them to study alone.Discuss both views and give your opinions. 78
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 413, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...nds gradually during these four decades.In contrast, United Kingdom dropped steadi...
^^
Line 4, column 13, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...t 6 metric tonnes in 2007. Portugal in the begin with around just 1 metric tonnes in 196...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 63, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...ith around just 1 metric tonnes in 1967.This was followed by a period of exponential...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1170.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91596638655 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59094859417 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491596638655 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 342.0 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.6813908747 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.25 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.75 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205403299005 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109795322789 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809777276789 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113565279453 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0862876871259 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.