The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The given graph illustrates the comparison of carbon dioxide emissions in terms of metric tonnes per one in the 4 selected countries during the period from 1967 over 40 years.
Overall, the average emissions were diverged through the period in all countries. While in Portugal and italy was seen a consistent increase, which is almost the equal in both trades, the number of carbon dioxide discharges in the United Kingdom and Sweden have seen the opposite trajectory, declining significant over the period.
The amount of emissions per person in Sweden greatly increased over the first decade and then, after reaching the highest point in the year 1977 in approximately 11 metric tonnes, the trend significantly declined more than twofold to nearly 5,7 in 2017.Comparatively, the same trajectory was more consistent in united kingdom, evidently, we can see, the proportion fell from 11 to 9 metric tonnes. In contrast, the gradual rise was in the average discharges in Italy and Portugal. Whilst the trend in italy has more relatively stable times, growing at nearly 3,7 from 4,2 to 7,9 per person, another one in Portugal was more constant, rising from 1,6 to about 5,5.
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England 78
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 79
- The pie charts below compare the hours worked by employees and self employed homeworkers in 2014 in the UK 89
- Many people feel that urban environments and more unhealthy than they have ever been What do you think are the main causes of this problem What measures can be effective in tackling this problem 54
- some people believe that software programming should be tacht at primary school others think that the focus at this level should be on playing both views opinion 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... declining significant over the period. The amount of emissions per person in Sw...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 254, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Comparatively
...more than twofold to nearly 5,7 in 2017.Comparatively, the same trajectory was more consisten...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14507772021 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81200641249 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60103626943 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 107.968230924 43.030603864 251% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 165.5 112.824112599 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.1666666667 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287323246602 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130885614944 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429353652999 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189966522416 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213430000245 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.2329268293 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 61.2550243902 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.