The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the average carbon-dioxide emissions per person between the years of 1967 to 2007 in the four countries. These include UK, Italy, Sweden and Portugal.
Generally we observe that the UK and Sweden have been successful in bringing down their emissions of carbon-dioxide between the years of 1967 to 2007. On the contrary, Italy and Portugal saw a significant increase in the emissions in the same time period.
It’s evident that in Italy, the emissions rose sharply in the 1970s and are now just below 8 metric tons. The Portugal also shows quite a sudden rise in emissions in the 1990s.
The Sweden shows an interesting trend, its emissions spiked sharply in the 1970s and then dropped as suddenly in the 1980s as it has risen. Although the emissions in the UK has been steadily decreasing, they are still highest among all at 9 metric tons.
Even though the lowest emissions are recorded in Portugal and Sweden, the earlier shows an upward trend. Whereas the UK which shows a downwards trend, still has the highest emissions.
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons were relevant. 33
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters (such as food, clothes and entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is impor 67
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...trend, still has the highest emissions.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, still, then, whereas, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97206703911 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65077764824 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564245810056 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8194743628 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290155122249 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112384348525 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0897262252529 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16467030993 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0841225683648 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.