The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car, bus or train between 1970 and 2030.
The line graph illustrates the number of people travelling by car, bus or train per day in UK from 1970 to 2030. At first glance, it is evident that the number of UK people travelling by car was highest over a period of 40 years and it is predicted that continuously increase in the future.
In 1970, the number of commuters who travelled by train was around 2 million people, compared to approximately 4 million people travelling by bus and just over 5 million people travelling by car. From 1980 to 2010, the rate of UK people using car considerably increase and it reached to just under 7 million people in 2010, and the figure for train rose slightly to 3 million people in 2010. The figure for bus minimally fell, at just over 3 million people in 2010.
Looking into the future, the number of UK commuters using car is predicted that continuously increase, peaking at 9 million people in 2030. Similar with car the figure for train will reach over 5 million people, whereas there will be only under 3 million people using bus in 2030.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-09 | WIWI UMAR | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-02 | hoang ngoc my | 89 | view |
| 2019-09-02 | hoang ngoc my | 11 | view |
| 2019-09-02 | hoang ngoc my | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | yen070998 | 84 | view |
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant 78
- The graphs below provide information on global population figures and figures for urban populations in different world regions 67
- The illustrations show how chocolate is produced 11
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities 56
- The process shows diamonds moving from the mine to the retailer 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the highest'.
Suggestion: was the highest
...e number of UK people travelling by car was highest over a period of 40 years and it is pre...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t continuously increase in the future. In 1970, the number of commuters who tra...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, look, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 861.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57978723404 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55046396866 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.452127659574 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9547861588 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8571428571 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279984736764 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179545580982 0.103423049105 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13796536314 0.0843802449381 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239505656249 0.15604864568 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0931314042625 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.