The line graph demonstrates the mean number of travellers who get to work using car, bus, and train over the course of 60 years from 1970 to 2030. Overall, it is clear that car was the most popular genre of transportation and train was the least used mode of transport. However, the latter has been predicted that it would become the second most favourite vehicle for commuters.
Having looked at the bar chart more closely for details, from 1970 to 1980, the number of car, bus, and train users remained stable, at roughly 5,4,2 million commuters respectively. Between 1980 and 2000, the proportion of car travellers witnessed a dramatic rise from 5 million to approximately 7 million people. The figure for bus dipped slightly, from 4 to under 4 million people. The data for train commuters experienced a marginal increase, from 2 to precisely 3 million passengers. From 2000 to 2030, the extent of car owners stayed unchanged at seven units for a decade, followed by a significant increase and peaked at 9 nine units in 2030. A similar pattern was seen in the number of train passengers. It remained stable at three million users for ten years, then surpass the number of bus passengers and reach its peak at 5 million people. The data for bus commuters will decline gradually and hit a low of nearly three units.
- Some educationalists argue that non exam art based subjects such as music drama art and craft should be compulsory in the secondary school curriculum They believe that activities such as these can improve overall academic performance To what extent 89
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 73
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Some educationalists argue that non exam art based subjects such as music drama art and craft should be compulsory in the secondary school curriculum They believe that activities such as these can improve overall academic performance To what extent do you 89
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country Others say that these are no the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language Discuss both views and give your own opini 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, second, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1093.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77292576419 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66245941697 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572052401747 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7981023552 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3636363636 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8181818182 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.81818181818 5.23603664747 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244230694434 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0981850783032 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738492891275 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19667850338 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00735911360174 0.0819641961636 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.