The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car, bus or train between 1970 and 2030.
Write a report for a university, lecturer describing the information shown below.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph provides information about the consumption of people travelling by bus, car, train between 1970 and 2030.
Overall, the number of people who travelling by car and train have been rising in the given period while bus has been falling gradually.
By looking at the chart, it is clear that car and train experienced a similar trend . More specifically, in the first 30 years, the amount of commuters who enjoy travelling by train and car witnessed a steadily rise by 1 millions and around 2 millions of people, respectively. But in 10 years later, both facilities were remain stable at 3 millions of commuters who enjoyed train travelling and 7 millions people travelling by car. From 2010 onwards, a numerous people are becoming more interested in travelling by car and train. We can see that both line are increasing rapidly and reach the peak
Otherwise, bus travelling were not popular from 1970 to 2030 when it remained stable at 4 millions people at first, which was followed by an slightly fall by 1 millions commuters between 1980 and 2030
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-02 | sonicmaster | view | |
| 2021-11-02 | sonicmaster | view | |
| 2021-10-22 | kvi | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-08 | Moon.Ma | 95 | view |
| 2021-05-22 | Raavi | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ar and train experienced a similar trend . More specifically, in the first 30 year...
^^
Line 5, column 201, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('steadily') instead an adjective, or a noun ('rise') instead of another adjective.
...y travelling by train and car witnessed a steadily rise by 1 millions and around 2 millions of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 242, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '2 million'.
Suggestion: 2 million
... steadily rise by 1 millions and around 2 millions of people, respectively. But in 10 years l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 322, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'remained'.
Suggestion: remained
...in 10 years later, both facilities were remain stable at 3 millions of commuters who e...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 339, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '3 million'.
Suggestion: 3 million
..., both facilities were remain stable at 3 millions of commuters who enjoyed train travelling ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 139, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... people at first, which was followed by an slightly fall by 1 millions commuters b...
^^
Line 7, column 139, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('fall') instead of another adjective.
... people at first, which was followed by an slightly fall by 1 millions commuters between 1980 an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 892.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9010989011 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74240731364 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582417582418 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6167072373 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.428571429 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210651104798 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117858910674 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714497275731 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159005710175 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0751499698364 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.