The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car, bus or train between 1970 and 2030.
Write a report for a university, lecturer describing the information shown below.
The pictorial diagram illustrates the UK commuters’ travelling choice over the years 1970 to 2021, as well as the prediction of this trend until 2030. As depicted, the commuters’ choice is divided into three main alternatives, namely, car, bus and train.
One of the eye-catching features of the graph is the jobholders, who utilize their private cars to commute between home and office, which was approximately 5.2 million in 1970 and is predicted to touch around 9 million in 2030. The aforementioned trend was fluctuated between the years 2000 and 2020, which had experienced a bounce back in the year 2000, however, the trend is totally upward and could keep its first place among all trends as the first choice to citizens’ daily trip, over the 60 years. Moreover, train commuters trend experience an analogous trend, as the car had. Although the train trend is almost cover 50% less population, comparing to those of car trend covers. In addition, between the years 2000 to 2010 the number of trains’ commuters was constant, while that of the car trend was plummeted.
Another interesting feature is related to the bus, which has a contradictory trend, comparing to the two others reported trends. As can be seen, in 1970 there was at least 4 million people who travelled by bus, however, the trend was obviously downward and will mark less than 3 million in 2030.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, moreover, well, while, at least, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1155.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97844827586 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76837915701 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590517241379 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.07073170732 560% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.2144316404 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.333333333 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7777777778 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179451503503 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0911875516779 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406411807977 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135582830276 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345315394859 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.