The graph below shows the average number of uk commuters travelling each day by car, bus or train between 1970 and 2030.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the average number of uk commuters travelling each day by car, bus or train between 1970 and 2030.

As we can see the line graph above describes how UK citizens travel using the automobile, bus, and train between the years of 1970 to 2030, measured in the millions.
In general, we can observe that in 1970 the commuters utilized the car as the highest form of transportation, and relied upon the train the least. In addition to this clear point. We can also witness that in 2030, the car is predicted to remain at the top, however, the bus is expected to be at the bottom.
Beginning with 1970 to 1990 we can see how car usage rose by around 1 million (5 million to 6 million). The bus fell to slightly under 4 million, and finally, the train made an estimated small jump from 2 to 2.5 million. Now, when it comes to 1990 to 2000 about 4 million more people are using the car than the train. For the bus, we can see a minimal decline from 1990 to 2000.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-10-09 WIWI UMAR 73 view
2019-09-02 hoang ngoc my 89 view
2019-09-02 hoang ngoc my 11 view
2019-09-02 hoang ngoc my 78 view
2019-08-02 yen070998 84 view
Essays by user yahya976 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, so, in addition, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 692.0 965.302439024 72% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.21951219512 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32236238417 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591463414634 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 198.9 283.868780488 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7638013438 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230299059162 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0966738895945 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810217798961 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178799398698 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0776421157526 0.0819641961636 95% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.2329268293 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.02 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.2 11.4140731707 63% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.