The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010.
The graph represents the amount of three different types of foods, namely; meat, salt and fish, consumed in China from 1985 to 2010.
Overall, the fish consumption was popular throughout the period given. It is interesting to note that, both fish and meat consumption increased while salt consumption decreased substantially.
From 1985 to 1995, the consumption for fish remained at 600 grams even though there was a periodic fluctuation. Meat was the lowest consumption in China of 100 grams in 1985 before it stably increased to 200 grams (nearly) by 1995, whereas salt experienced a declining trend from 500 grams in 1985 to around 350 grams in 1995.
The amount of consumption for fish continued to rise remarkably to reach at close to 900 grams in 2010, whilst the salt decreased continuously with its consumption to end at 200 grams which figure is the same as meat's consumed amount in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | Kien Vu | 67 | view |
| 2019-06-26 | windingsilverfish | 78 | view |
| 2019-04-04 | ochirvaani | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-30 | Vadim | 56 | view |
| 2019-01-28 | Vadim | 61 | view |
- By punishing murderers with the death penalty, society is also guilty of committing murder. Therefore, life in prison is a better punishment for murderers. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
- Levels of youth crime are increasing rapidly in most cities around the world. What are the reasons for this, and suggest some solutions. 56
- “Prevention is better than cure”. Researching and treating diseases is too costly so it would be better to invest in preventative measures. To what extent do you agree? 73
- The graph below shows the number of complaints made about noise to Environmental Health authorities in the city of Newtown between 1980 and 1996. 73
- The rising levels of congestion and air pollution found in most of the world cities can be attributed directly to the rapidly increasing number of private cars in use. In order to reverse this, decline in the quality of life in cities, attempts must be ma 73
Discourse Markers used:
['if', 'whereas', 'while']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.210843373494 0.268076937826 79% => OK
Verbs: 0.144578313253 0.116061578633 125% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0542168674699 0.0759168565197 71% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0481927710843 0.0366838410393 131% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0180722891566 0.0131127313244 138% => OK
Prepositions: 0.168674698795 0.155750635184 108% => OK
Participles: 0.0301204819277 0.0379272487307 79% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.79057163161 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0542168674699 0.0210936926555 257% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0722891566265 0.0948980150116 76% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00602409638554 0.00967000014798 62% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 897.0 1161.00487805 77% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.9 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.94039735099 5.90752243213 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73763899035 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.291390728477 0.337110787985 86% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.198675496689 0.247514529752 80% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.17880794702 0.171178102325 104% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.145695364238 0.112407865282 130% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79057163161 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556291390728 0.546246751206 102% => OK
Word variations: 45.386015504 49.3433353143 92% => OK
How many sentences: 6.0 8.93414634146 67% => OK
Sentence length: 25.1666666667 23.0094962315 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0194412947 42.9750493124 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.5 135.714022679 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1666666667 23.0094962315 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.689975730869 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 45.0342163355 47.7609492067 94% => OK
Elegance: 1.94285714286 2.94281807926 66% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295656911624 0.418131533498 71% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.180214809212 0.181151798455 99% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.10041836845 0.0850326197045 118% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.809683166395 0.706616315825 115% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.164332663467 0.157042692854 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178062987289 0.228904883108 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553167374606 0.108899403657 51% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.256523970176 0.367819155151 70% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0802964256921 0.0812612215331 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211003687663 0.316326947829 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289141474679 0.0921553760075 31% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70731707317 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.14146341463 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.08536585366 49% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.16585365854 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 0.956097560976 105% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.02926829268 66% => OK
Total topic words: 6.0 7.1512195122 84% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.