The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given line graph gives information about the trend of Chinese' food consumption: Meat, salt and fish per week from 1985 to 2010.

As an overall trend, it can be seen that Chinese people prefer to eat fish the most over the given period while consuming salt has decreased significantly.

In 1985, the having fish accounted for almost 600 grams(g), and five years later, it rose by 100g, however, went back to the same level like the beginning of the year in 1995. Following that, there was an upwards trend consistently, reaching approximately 850g, which was the highest. Contrarily, the second largest food consumption was salt at the beginning of the period, but since then its figure continued to decline dramatically to about 200g in 2010.

In the meanwhile, the least popular food consumption among given categories was meat throughout the years. Meat consumption started from only 100g in 1985, and it showed a gradual increase to 200g in 2005. Since then, its data had remained stable, reaching the same figure of consumption of salt by Chinese in the final year.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97237569061 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64408368541 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629834254144 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.0755120167 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.5 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15980531776 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717418068685 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524268633498 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106010380145 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544868851655 0.0819641961636 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.