The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restuarnts between 2003 and 2013.
The given bar chart gives information about the frequency of consuming junk food at fast food restaurants in America from 2003 to 2013.
As an overall trend, it can be seen that American people tend to fancy eating out at fast food restaurants generally once a week or once or twice a month, while people who visit these types of restaurants every day were the lowest figure among all consumers over the given period.
Regarding the chart, the majority of people dropped by junk food chains once a month accounted for nearly a third in 2013, which had a significant increase from 2006. In contrast, the date of consumers who ate junk food once a week consisted of approximately 28% in the final year, which decreased by about 5% from 2006.
On the other hand, Americans who enjoyed eating fast food at restaurants at least several times a week or a few times a year had some quite similar trends. The former comprised of 20% in 2006, but seven years later had a decline to almost 17%. Meanwhile, the latter stand at precisely 15% in both years. In the meantime, less than only 5% of Americans went to fast food shops daily or never visit there respectively throughout the years, which were the lowest figures.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-23 | marykim7178 | 78 | view |
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this option?What sort of punishment should parents and t 84
- The given first pie chart gives information about typical Australian household energy usages while the second pie chart presents the rate of greenhouse gas emissions caused by Australian household, which lead to environmental problems. 56
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. 84
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 89
- Some people think that good health is very important to every person, so medical service should not be ran by profit-making companies. Do the advantages of private health care outweigh the disadvantages. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, so, third, while, at least, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1004.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66976744186 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48620205313 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604651162791 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.0950847041 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.5 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.875 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 5.23603664747 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178976621933 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078961648707 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682660139912 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125876511978 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608760133364 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.