The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph provides data about the consumption of meat, salt and fish in China in the time span between 1985 and 2010. Units are measured in grams per per person per week.

Overall, it is clear from the graph that Chinese mostly preferred to consume fish during all the period of time given. Conversely, meat and salt were less consumed but on the one hand salt saw a steep decline all over the years while meat moderately grew.

At the beginning of the period, 600 was the figure of the fish, which peaked at exactly 700 in 1990, then return to the initial value in 1995. After this first up and down trend, the consume of fish started to rise sharply so that in 2010 almost 850 grams were consumed.

Instead, as concerned to salt and meat, these two food had exhibit a monotonous opposite trend without up and down. In fact, in 1985, salt and meat had figures of approximately 500 and 100 respectively. However, from this point to the end of the time span, their consume began to varied. Evidently, salt products dropped significantly, while meat steadily rose and reached salt products in 2010 when both food had a figure of nearly 200.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: per
...5 and 2010. Units are measured in grams per per person per week. Overall, it is clea...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...referred to consume fish during all the period of time given. Conversely, meat and salt were l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 257, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r the years while meat moderately grew. At the beginning of the period, 600 was ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 180, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...95. After this first up and down trend, the consume of fish started to rise sharply so that...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 60, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'exhibited'.
Suggestion: exhibited
...ed to salt and meat, these two food had exhibit a monotonous opposite trend without up ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 60, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'exhibited'.
Suggestion: exhibited
...ed to salt and meat, these two food had exhibit a monotonous opposite trend without up ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, however, if, so, then, while, in fact

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 947.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59708737864 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31205086994 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621359223301 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.7452604789 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0845660600704 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0368356314053 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480361400974 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0545052986026 0.15604864568 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363140484045 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.