The graph below shows changes in global food and oil prices between 2000 and 2011.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant.
The graph illustrates the trends in food and oil prices in the global context between 2000 and 2011.
Apparently, both categories have an upward trend during 11 years. Regarding the food price, the initial years (from 2000 to 2008) showed a gradual rising figure with its peak at 220 index points in 2008. It was followed by a sharp decline in 2009 that scored 140 index points. However, steady growth was witnessed throughout the following year and reached its peak at 240 at the end of the period in 2011. Similarly, the graph showed a plateau of increasing figures, arriving at its peak in 2008, the same as the food price, at around $120. Both experienced a sharp dip in 2009 but in the case of oil, it has only around $100 in 2011, the end of the graph.
To sum up, both trends experienced a gradual growth from 2000 to 2008, followed by a dramatic decline in 2008-2009 and steadily increased till the end of the years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-09 | Awadhesh Mourya | 56 | view |
| 2022-01-06 | mrinal | 82 | view |
| 2021-11-10 | ngango56 | 56 | view |
| 2021-10-28 | hoangvu0601 | 100 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | nick surya | 61 | view |
- You should spend about 40 minutes in this task Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for yo 73
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a complusory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, however, regarding, similarly, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 757.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50595238095 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38261102941 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559523809524 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 203.4 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2687443784 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.625 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172338713237 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921301468542 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113737735976 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171863089167 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145293044077 0.0819641961636 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 84.0 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.