The graph below shows the changing patterns of access to modern technology in homes in the UK expressed in percentage terms Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant CD player DVD player Int

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the changing patterns of access to modern technology in homes in the UK (expressed in percentage terms).

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
- CD player - DVD player - Internet connection

- Mobile phone Write at least 150 words.

The given line graph illustrates the transformation trends of using modern technology devices namely CD player, DVD player, mobile phone, and internet connection in households in the UK from 1994 to 2008.

Overall, the changing proportions of access technology tools increased over the period of 15 years. Although the four trends were similar in a general term went up, the change of CD player is the highest in four categories.

From 1994 to 1997, the changing of the CD player rose slightly, at 60% of the period. Throughout the remainder of the period, there was steady growth of CD player. However, in the 2006-2008 period, the trend was downward at about 85%. Between 1998 to 2008, Internet connection increased gradually at about 65%.

In the same period, DVD player and mobile phone had more significantly upward trends than two others. From 1996 to 2003, the mobile phone fluctuation was wild. After that, it has moderate waves, at about 80% in 2008. From 2002 to 2005, DVD player went up dramatically, at about 80% in 2005. Throughout the remainder of the years, there was a steady growth, at about 80% in 2008.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-07-05 nana14 11 view
2022-04-14 Lynh Lynh 95 view
2021-10-19 Hongnhi view
2021-10-19 Hongnhi 100 view
2021-10-10 Hongnhi 11 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 944.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94240837696 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64593261508 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544502617801 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 13.0 3.36585365854 386% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.284298348 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.6666666667 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9166666667 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.916666666667 5.23603664747 18% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176946705669 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696061689708 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681470827187 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133335874403 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0609225118344 0.0819641961636 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.