The graph below shows chnages in global food and oil prices between 2000 and 2011
The given line graph illustrates/ compares the differences in the average price of oil and the food price index over a period of 11 years
Overall, it is noticeable that the average global prices of both oil and food rose considerably during the given period. Especially, the food price index appeared to be the one that led the chart at the end of the period.
Looking at the chart more closely, in the year 2000, the average global oil price hovered around $27 per barrel and the food price stood at roughly 88 points. Over the next 4 years, the both prices increased negligibly, before climbing steadily/ gradually between 2004 and 2006. However, by 2007, while the average oil price decreased slightly to $60, the price of food went up gradually to approximately 140 points.
In terms of the data in the remaining years, from 2007 to 2008, the prices of both oil and food witnessed a rapid/ sharp growth, at about just over $120 and 220 points respectively. Nevertheless, a surge in both commodity prices was undergone in 2009. 2 years later, the similar pattern was seen in the figure for the prices of both oil and food and the food price index reached its peak of roughly 238 points at the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-08 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-08 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-08 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-08 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-08 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, nevertheless, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61751152074 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48257534842 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511520737327 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.377680522 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.25 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.125 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311848584425 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14617223192 0.103423049105 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664530966383 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213881017436 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331548579492 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.