Writing Task 2: Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country, while some people think it is bad. Discuss both views and state your opinion
It is believed by some that the country is able to benefit from hosting major international sports events. From my perspective, I think that such events could bring detrimental effects on the host nation in many aspects.
On the one hand, there are plenty of reasons why some people support the idea that hosting international sports events could be advantageous for the country. One of the primary causes is that local economy could be reinforced/ fostered. It is much more likely that hospitality and tourism industries and businesses involved sports merchandising are able to benefit from the influx of sports fans from all over the world. More people can find work in hotels or restaurants. In addition, such international events are an opportunity to make money for local residents when they can also sell souvenirs and local products such as traditional food and clothes to visitors. Therefore, this can help generate more income for local inhabitants and enhance their living standards. Moreover, international sports events are able to aid the youth of the host country in improving their health. Extensive sports coverage on TV fires the imagination of adolescents and thus, all keen to take up sport and emulate their national heroes. Thereby, competitive spirit is fostered and health is promoted.
On the other hand, I hold a belief that the situation could have adverse impacts to some extent. First of all, if the government of the host nation provides funding for these events, then it must curb public spending on hospitals, schools and welfare state. For instance, the Brazilian government spent money on building stadiums for the 2014 World Cup and now it lacks money to deal with the coronavirus pandemic. Furthermore, international sports events can disturb the life of local people. When there are a great deal of travellers, this could lead to dramatically irritate local inhabitants as risk of the crime rate can rise as well as residents is usually able to endure to get stuck in traffic. Therefore, such events could result in many problems for local people.
In conclusion, although it is true to some that hosting international sports events could be great beneficial for the country, I personally think that these events are able to bring detrimental effects on the host nation in a wide range of aspects.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-07-11 | llrasthy J | 84 | view |
2023-07-07 | Kiwi | 56 | view |
2023-02-14 | Kiwi | 73 | view |
2023-02-05 | hi.nguyn91 | 89 | view |
2023-01-29 | ThanhHacker0306 | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 575, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...make money for local residents when they can also sell souvenirs and local produc...
^^
Line 5, column 518, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'deals'?
Suggestion: deals
...of local people. When there are a great deal of travellers, this could lead to drama...
^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ost nation in a wide range of aspects.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1963.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11197916667 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.799321701 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510416666667 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 605.7 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8920961245 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.055555556 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4444444444 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263067867644 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0856413771571 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745308108648 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187651858436 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451681417109 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.