The line graph illustrates the percentage of attendance in cinema by age group in Great Britain between years of 1984 to 2000.
In regards to youth, age group of 15 - 24 years had dominated cinema attendence over all span of time, which increased from 17% in 1984 to 54% in 2000. However, It had seen some rise and fall between 1991 to 1996. Also in age group of 7 - 15 years attendence had fluctuated in early years but after that, it had rised significantly from 10% in 1984 to 32% in 2000.
In the age group of 25 - 35 years, fluctuation in cinema attendence had seen in later years of time frame but overall, it rised from 5% to 32% in span of 14 years. In adult age group of 35 and over, it had consistently rised but had lowest increase in percentage of cinema attendence.
All in all, from the line graph we can say that cinema attendence in Great Britain had increased in all age group over span of 14 years.
- Young people are often influenced in their behaviours and situations by others in the same age This is called peer pressure Do the disadvantages of peer pressure outweigh the advantages 78
- The diagram below shows the environment issues raised by a product over its life cycle Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 73
- The best way to solve environmental problems would be for the current generation to accept a simpler way of life for the sake of the next generation To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Learning english at school is often seen as more important than learning local languages If these are not taught many are at risk of dying out In your opinion is it important for everyone to learn English Should we try to ensure the survival of local lang 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: Regarding; With regard to
...itain between years of 1984 to 2000. In regards to youth, age group of 15 - 24 years had d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 230, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the lowest'.
Suggestion: had the lowest
...and over, it had consistently rised but had lowest increase in percentage of cinema attend...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 750.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.33526011561 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47880999008 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.450867052023 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2632012932 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.142857143 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33199198122 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.196160847085 0.103423049105 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138031278732 0.0843802449381 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280105216981 0.15604864568 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120775409671 0.0819641961636 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.19 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.93 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.