The bar chart illustrates the data concerning the estimated proportion of car trips taken by gender for different purposes in 2005.
Overall, it can readily apparent that both males and females had taken the highest car trips for work purposes in 2005. Also, women accounted for majority of car trips for the various purposes.
In detail, men took slightly more than 50% of car trips due to work purpose whereas the same purpose was accounted 39% for women. Also, this was the highest proportion of car trips made by both the gender. In addition, men dominated in other purposes such as visiting town and recreation, the figure for that measured at 9% and 11% respectively. By contrast, women merely took car trips for the same purposes.
With regarding to women, in shopping, they took second highest car trips which was stood at 18% and it was followed by courses and running errands figured at 12% and 10% respectively. For women, visiting town was the least preferred car trip at merely 2% while men was accounted for bank and running errands at 3% respectively for both the purposes.
- The graph below shows cinema attendance by age group in Great Britain 67
- In some countries it has been observed that many parents choose to teach their children at home rather than sending them to school Do the advantages of children studying at home outweigh the disadvantages 56
- The diagram below shows the environment issues raised by a product over its life cycle Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 73
- Young people are often influenced in their behaviours and situations by others in the same age This is called peer pressure Do the disadvantages of peer pressure outweigh the advantages 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, second, so, whereas, while, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 911.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87165775401 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54065291065 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513368983957 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4968353163 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.222222222 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204113322725 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117970361323 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103502290301 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184618947304 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119628578339 0.0819641961636 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.