The maps below show recent changes in the town of Kimsville.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and
make comparisons where relevant
The two maps illustrate the main developments in the town called kingsville between 2002 and now.
Overall, it can be clearly seen that the town underwent a significant modernization over the given period, becoming less green and more built-up.
In 2002, there used to be trees in both northwestern and southwestern corners of the town, but they were cut down, so that new apartments and a football stadium could be introduced on their locations, respectively. The factory located east of the city centre was knocked down, and now there is a software company in its area. Another notable change is the demolition of the old cinema to make way for a pub.
A new train station adjacent to the city centre was constructed over the period given in kingsville. The trees, which were situated in the northwestern and southwestern part of the town remained the same. Similarly, the city centre and the shopping centre above it experienced no changes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-29 | Ammu helen | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | Ammu helen | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-16 | ngtrankhanhlinh | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-01 | arjnaga | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-23 | BangLangTim | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 61
- The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007. 67
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 78
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 16, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...centre above it experienced no changes.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, similarly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 818.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14465408805 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88777199369 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.635220125786 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1975044754 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.25 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0732858636406 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0325298969181 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385861318082 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0526493863599 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421213967054 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.