The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004
The line graph shows variations in the weekly consumption of fish and three types of meat in one European country from 1 979 to 2004.
Although there were fluctuations, overall, people in this country consistently ate more meat than fish, and the general trend was to move away from beef and lamb as chicken became the dominant food in this category
In the first decade, beef was consumed in significantly higher quantities than the other foods listed. Despite an initial sharp fall to approximately 175 grams, it then recovered reaching a high of close to 240 grams per week. However, from 1989 onwards, beef consumption fell almost continually, and by 2004 had almost halved. Lamb almost exactly mirrored this fluctuating trend, falling from second highest initially (at 150 grams) to approximately 60 grams per week by the end of the period.
In contrast, chicken climbed from less than 150 grams in 1979 and took the lead from around 1990 onwards. Interestingly, the increases in chicken corresponded with the declines in beef and lamb, and by 2002 chicken consumption had exceeded all previous rates, reaching approximately 260 grams a week, although this peak was not maintained.
Fish was consistently eaten the least, beginning at around 60 grams per week then dropping to below 50 grams. While it was the lowest, it remained relatively stable for the majority of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 82 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
- Average daily milk beverage product consumption among adult age groups in Canada in milliliters 95
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the samepark today 73
- Many people choose to work or live abroad because of the higher standards of living they can find outside their home country Do you think this brings more advantages or disadvantages to the people who follow this path 74
- Graph 78
- Line graph 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 215, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecame the dominant food in this category In the first decade, beef was consumed i...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, then, while, as to, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1158.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05676855895 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7808537768 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602620087336 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.1974316427 43.030603864 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.666666667 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4444444444 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156994720298 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740346235631 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11484148527 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120320986952 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134997966655 0.0819641961636 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.