The line graph reveals information about the amount of fish and other types of meat consumed by a person in a week in a county presented in the Europe continent over a period of 25 years.
Overall, it can be seen that there was an upward trend in the consumption of chicken, whereas beef, lamb, and fish had a downward trend during the period 1974-2000. At the start of the period, beef was the most demanded food, which was replaced with chicken in 1989. In contrast, fish was the least preferred kind of food consumed by people in that country.
To begin with, the consumption of chicken started at about 150 grams in 1979 and increased gradually over a period of time to about 250 grams per person per week in 2004. Therefore, the chicken was the highest demanded food in 2004. In contrast, lamb and beef consumption had the opposite pattern. In 1979, the amount of consumption was about 220 grams and 150 grams, respectively. After that, there was a significant decrease in the consumption of beef and lamb by approximately 100 grams until 2004.
On the other hand, the consumption of fish remained stable from 1974 to 2004. The figure started at around 65 grams and ended with just under 50 grams in 2004, which made fish the least demanded food in that country.
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 79
- People living in 21st century generally have better quality life than people born in earlier centuries To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how there causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and mak 78
- the table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 78
- Write a letter to your friend to recommend a book to read that you have read You should include Describe the book How it can help him her Where can he get it from 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 359, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ood consumed by people in that country. To begin with, the consumption of chicke...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 109, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... in 1979 and increased gradually over a period of time to about 250 grams per person per week ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 218, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he least demanded food in that country.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, whereas, in contrast, kind of, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1055.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66814159292 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51047223203 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486725663717 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5868097377 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9090909091 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5454545455 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45454545455 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161934319789 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071321458632 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0301380334694 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10411319256 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222637183603 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.93 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.