The given line graph depicts how the popularity of the consumption of fish and three types of meat in a country in Europe from 1979 to 2004.
In general, there was a mix of changing patterns with respect to the figures for the consumption of fish and three types of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Throughout the period, the number of the use of fish was constantly receiving the lowest figures. Noticeably, the statistics of chicken recorded the most significant growth among all categories.
At the beginning of the period, beef and lamb experienced the highest numbers with 220 and 150 grams, respectively. In the next three years, there was a moderate decline in the numbers of consumption of beef and lamb to 170 grams and 110 grams respectively. However, throughout the 16-year period, the amounts of beef and lamb consumed dropped to approximately 100 and 50 grams, respectively. Therefore, in 1979, beef was by far the most popular of these foods but in the last year, it was not what it used to be.
Turning to the figures for chicken and fish, they came in third and fourth place in 1979, with 140 grams and 60 grams respectively. During the 25-year period, there was a sharp increase in the consumption of chicken to nearly 250 grams in 2004. Meanwhile, throughout the same time, the statistics of fish experienced a period of mild fluctuations bouncing within the range from 60 grams to 40 grams each year till 2004.
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons when relevant 56
- Advertising is becoming more and more common in everyday life Is this a positive or negative development 78
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 78
- Nowadays many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention at school What are the reasons What could be done to solve this problem 61
- The restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure It would be more beneficial to spend this money on building new houses and roads Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gnificant growth among all categories. At the beginning of the period, beef and...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, therefore, third, while, in general, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1198.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 252.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75396825397 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75857306802 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480158730159 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.0747642392 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.909090909 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9090909091 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142924704244 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630716835432 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797238966455 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120244976879 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0778023721643 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.