The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given chart illustrates the proportion of fish and other kinds of meat consumed by a European nation in the period of 25 years from 1979 to 2004.
Overall the consumption of fish and different types of meat has seen a dramatic fluctuation.
In particular the yield of fish eaten has slightly slowed down, from over 50 grams per person per week down to approximately 45 grams. The reduction is more or less 10 grams in the given period.
On the other hand, the number of lamb in the given period has witnessed a significant change. Particularly the consumption of lamb has oscillated, but decreased, from 150 grams per person per week to about 50 grams.
In contrast to the lamb consumption, the number of chicken consumed has eventually gone up over the period on 25 years, from approximately 145 grams rising to nearly 250 grams per person per week. This surge has led chicken to be the most consumed meat from 1979 to 2004.
Similarly to the lamb eaten, the amount of beef has plummeted, though increased within the years 1981-1983, and 1985-1988. The yield of beef has decreased from nearly 220 to 180 grams from 1979 to 1981, as well as massively rising from 1981 to 1983, and 1985 to 1988. However, since 1990, the quantity of beef has fluctuated a lot. In an over view, the amount of beef has drastically reduced.
In summary, the quantity of fish and other meat consumed has all changed from 1979 to 2004. However, the amount of fish has been evaluated as a gradual change, particularly a decrease, when compared to others.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-23 | zhao_kangg | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-06 | Trác Ngọc | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | nguyenanhkhoi1702 | 67 | view |
| 2022-04-13 | Carrotte | view | |
| 2021-12-02 | oscar_666 | 78 | view |
- Scientists believe that the increasing average temperature is an issue What caused global warming and present solution to reduce its effect 85
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Some children spend hours everyday on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
- Problems with environmental pollution have become so serious that many countries are trying to solve these problems Suggest possible solutions and give your opinion 89
- Global warming is increasing day by day what are the causes of global warming and what can be done to eradicate this global problem 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...most consumed meat from 1979 to 2004. Similarly to the lamb eaten, the amount of beef h...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 145, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...83, and 1985-1988. The yield of beef has decreased from nearly 220 to 180 grams f...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, similarly, so, well, in contrast, in particular, in summary, as well as, in contrast to, more or less, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 33.7804878049 169% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1272.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 271.0 196.424390244 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69372693727 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63406609959 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468634686347 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 351.9 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.3320614992 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8571428571 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 5.23603664747 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 3.83414634146 183% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110464384062 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489774649269 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643952983619 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.079144725794 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660971337752 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.