In the contemporary epoch, modern technology has enabled researchers and travelers to voyage to distant natural sites. While this can greatly benefit wildlife conservation and discovery programs, I firmly assert that this development, in an overall view, poses implicit threats to the nature.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that the advancement in technology brings significant advantages to wildlife conservation and research programs. Scientific discoveries operated in far-flung destinations can help scientists and biologists gain a better insight into the environment and the evolution of indigenous species. Consequently, researchers will acquire precious information about the local habitats. For instance, several details obtained by scientists from studies conducted in the Antarctic have provided essential knowledge about the population density and dispersal index of some native animals ranging from penguins, seals, to whales. Moreover, this data can illuminate the mating habits and fertility rate which are crucial for scientists to develop methods in order to preserve the ecosystem and further the biodiversity.
On the other hand, I believe the threat of pollution these activities pose must be highlighted. One obvious danger is oil spills from cruise ships and other forms of transportation traveling to distant conservation sites. Oil spills release a great quantity of poisonous oil and harmful chemicals into the ocean. These toxins can therefore kill numerous marine species, devastate spacious areas under the ocean, and most hazardously, disturb the ecological balance. Moreover, as every continent in the globe is inextricably intertwined with the ocean, any damage to this complex system can lead to the imbalance of the global animals and vegetation.
In conclusion, scientific research and intrepid tourism may play a pivotal role in contributing to conservation breeding efforts; nonetheless, I am of the opinion that they pose more pressing existential threats to the environment. Thus, it is imperative to simultaneously conduct studies effectively and protect the Earth's fragile ecosystem from further degradation.
- Some people think that people are responsible for their happiness Others feel that happiness depends on other factors in their life Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- People are consuming more and more sugar based drinks Why What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption 89
- The use of mobile phones is as antisocial as smoking Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phones should be banned like smoking To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Young people are often influenced by their peers To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1852.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89808917197 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13936503194 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640127388535 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9585140397 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.285714286 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107563300003 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0323041536382 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351469886101 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0594501585835 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487916201509 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.24 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.32 8.58950901804 132% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 78.4519038076 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1852.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89808917197 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13936503194 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640127388535 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9585140397 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.285714286 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107563300003 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0323041536382 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351469886101 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0594501585835 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487916201509 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.24 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.32 8.58950901804 132% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 78.4519038076 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.