The presented line graph illustrates the amount of fish, beef, lamb and chicken eaten by European people from 1979 to 2004.
Overall, while the consumption of fish was quite steady, those of the others had a significant fluctuation over this period. In addition, beginning as the meat consumed the most in 1979, beef’s figure noticeably fell, whereas that of chicken grew, becoming the most popular meat around the region in 2004.
Turning to the detail, a small decline in the amount of fish consumed has been detected, starting from about 60 grams per person per week in 1979 to about 50 grams per person per week in 1984. The figure experienced 15 years of stability before decreased mildly in 1999, then remained constant by the year 2004.
By contrast, from the high starting points of 220 grams and 150 grams per person per week respectively in 1979, the consumption of beef and lamb spent many years oscillating. However, in general, both of them had a downward trend up to 2004. On the other hand, the consumption of chicken significantly increased from the starting point of below 150 grams per person per week to approximately 250 grams per person per week in 2004.
- Nowadays, sport is becoming a big business with high earning for professional sportsmen and a lot of companies have involved in financially and in other ways.Is this a positive or negative development? 84
- Some people think that we should invent a new language for international communication Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some people think that it is a waste of money for countries to host big sporting events like the world cup, and that the money would be better spent on other things. However, others think that hosting large sporting events has a clear, positive impact on 89
- The map below is of the town of Canterbury. A new school is planned for the area. The map shows to possible sites for the school. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- which is the event exerting the biggest influence on your country? 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The presented line graph illustrates the...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by European people from 1979 to 2004. Overall, while the consumption of fish w...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...opular meat around the region in 2004. Turning to the detail, a small decline i...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en remained constant by the year 2004. By contrast, from the high starting poin...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, whereas, while, in addition, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 986.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88118811881 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61401139684 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539603960396 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3991450386 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.25 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.125 5.23603664747 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116238683983 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609119335056 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399502732763 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0910011031144 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441083262431 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.