It is observed that in many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subjects. What are the causes? And what will be the effects on society?
Many nations have recently witnessed an insufficient number of students specializing in science. Two main reasons stand out as responsible for this decline, which is believed to exert several influences upon society.
To begin with, the dropping enrolment of science training programs can be explained by two major contributing factors. Firstly, the field is often considered to be challenging, requiring people channel most of their time into intellectual tasks in laboratories or libraries. Thus, as youngsters drawing their attention mostly to social interaction, it is understandable that students tend to neglect this demanding field. Another cause stems from the lack of opportunities for development. For example, in Vietnam, if students are majored in science, they will have a narrow list of potential workplace including state-owned institutes, which can offer only a living wage. This, compared to a decent remuneration of other jobs, makes science an unwise option because its strenuous training brings about an inadequate economic outcome.
It is foreseen that this tendency will enormously affect nations. Indeed, the dropping popularity of science leads to the lack of qualified and specialized scientists, who can push back the frontiers of knowledge and satisfy society’s demand of advances in technology. Consequently, since the less innovations contributed, the less likely firms harness technology to gain their competitive edge and promote their business. Additionally, an imbalance in labor structure may emerge when a majority of citizens is equipped with knowledge about arts and humanities, reflecting their preference for subject choice. Not only does this raise a question mark over training qualities of overpopulated courses but also contributes to insufficient job vacancies related to this field, making candidates face a likelihood of unemployment.
Briefly, the insufficiency in science students occurs as a result of two major causes, the effects of which should not be overlooked due to their severities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-13 | Dongvo | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Dongvo | 61 | view |
| 2019-05-15 | Ngoc Nguyen | 89 | view |
| 2018-11-30 | phuong cao | 89 | view |
| 2018-11-21 | Lehongloc | 78 | view |
- In many countries imprisonment is the most common solution to crimes. However some people believe that better education will be a more effective solution. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people think governments should spend money on faster means of transport. However, others think money should be spent on other priorities (e.g: environment, cost). Discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
- some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports, while others think people should have freedom to do any sports or activity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- International travel has many advantages to both travelers and the country that they visited. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xert several influences upon society. To begin with, the dropping enrolment of...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...about an inadequate economic outcome. It is foreseen that this tendency will e...
^^^^
Line 5, column 299, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun innovations is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... in technology. Consequently, since the less innovations contributed, the less likel...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...overlooked due to their severities.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, look, may, so, thus, for example, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1756.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77631578947 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20242047265 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677631578947 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3476367991 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.428571429 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114684383852 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0401408076327 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354732621041 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0777002470083 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377401781107 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.