The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in Europe country between 1979 and 2004.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in Europe country between 1979 and 2004.

The given table illustrates the shift of consuming fish and meat preference in an European nation over 5 years from 1975 to 2004.

Overall, it is immediately clear that fish was the least favourable sort among 4 categories over 5 years.

On the one hand, it is obvious that only the consumption of chicken witnessed an upward trend during this time. In 1979, it figure was just about 148 grams per person per week, as the time passed by, the statistic jumped up sharply and made chicken dominating the graph data.

On the other hand, the three remained assortments saw the same downward trend in consumption. However, the consuming of fish was almost the same it was in 1979 because of a slight decrease. Besides, it is interesting that, despite being the most prefered meat in 1979 with approx 220 grams per person weekly, beef dropped fastly to under 100 grams per person per week and was far less than that of chicken in 2004.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-07-15 alona2501 78 view
2018-07-02 ajmeet 61 view
2018-07-02 ajmeet 61 view
2018-06-30 suman_preetkaur 100 view
Essays by user alona2501 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...f consuming fish and meat preference in an European nation over 5 years from 1975 ...
^^
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... nation over 5 years from 1975 to 2004. Overall, it is immediately clear that fi...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'figures'?
Suggestion: figures
...ard trend during this time. In 1979, it figure was just about 148 grams per person per...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, so, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 776.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70303030303 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42330284822 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 219.6 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9020244989 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.857142857 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130886410242 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05684386634 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330030297816 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0770560496766 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264466729195 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.