the graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004
The line graph illustrate about the meal of fish and several different types of meat from 1979 to 2004 in Europe.
Overall, at the beginning of the period beef fragment contributed the largest to the expenditure of fish and kinds of meat, while fish was the negative part. In comparison, at the end of the period chicken segment became most popular while fish sameness placed was the least to the fact.
In 1979, beef and lamb section accounted for 220 and 150, which first and secondly big positive but similarity experienced to low process whilst both random movement and stand at 110 and 80.
On the other hand, chicken segment calculated for 140 in 1979, which the third of consumptions and had fluctuated for one measurement while became the highest trend in 2004 was got 250. Differently, fish expense was 65 at the first, while reach a trough of consumption until in 2014.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
- The table below shows the sales made by a coffee shop in an office building on a typical weekday 11
- he bar charts shows CO2 emissions for different forms of transport in the European Union 84
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 56
- The table below gives information on the proportion of carbohydrates, protein and fat in three different diets. 56
- many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines. Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
...h illustrate about the meal of fish and several different types of meat from 1979 to 2004 in Euro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, third, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 736.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81045751634 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53860786292 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614379084967 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 207.0 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0067453817 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.666666667 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 5.23603664747 220% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206513023192 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108097684249 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.083782471508 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131807814337 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0896539773158 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.