The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010
The charts illustrate about the average of household expenditures in a country between 1950 and 2010. Overall, at the beginning of the period health care contributed the least to the household expenditures of country, while housing was the most significant part. In comparison, at the end of the term, food was the largest household expenditures and the most negative trend was health care segment.
With regards to household expenditures, health care sector accounted for 2.4% in 1950 and had a slight growth of 2.1% in 2010. Originally of the time, food and transportation part included for 11.2% and 3.3% which both was experience a more than threefold increase to 34.0% and 14.0%. Meanwhile, in 1950, other section services made up 4.4% of household expenditures respectively, and increased dramatically to 19.2% in 2010.
In another major categories, in 1950, education got 6.6% which the third highest categories and fell to 6.3%. Temporarily, housing part included 72.1% and plunged to 22.0% which was the sharp drop in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-21 | nguyen thanh sang | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-30 | Mostakima Tawrin | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-26 | Sarina2021 | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-26 | Sarina2021 | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-05 | quytnee | 84 | view |
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 56
- The charts below show UK and USA energy consumption in 2000 and 2006 67
- The chart below show the comparison of different kind of energy production of France in two years 73
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010 73
- he bar charts shows CO2 emissions for different forms of transport in the European Union 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 873.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25903614458 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98350937729 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572289156627 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.0241042171 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.125 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.23603664747 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288304593622 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144982409116 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.161218282307 0.0843802449381 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17773505001 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0889569962216 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.