he bar charts shows CO2 emissions for different forms of transport in the European Union
The charts illustrate the different CO2 erudition and currency spending out forms of transport. Overall, air part contributed the biggest to the CO2 emission whilst funds roads too and the most negative was coaches with for money is airports.
Regarding to the initial data, air part was 380 which was the highest contributed forms of transport. Secondly segment was placed by passenger car which stood up of 180. Nevertheless, buses was got 70 which contrast than maritime and rail segment which similarity of that just only 50. And that it followed by coaches which the most negative donated of forms of transport.
On the other denomination, roads happened be the most positive proportion on the moneys especially standing at 52% and catch up by railways was 31% as though public transport fragment stick up at 10%. Neatly, ports and unknown section be in sameness place of 2%. The last of form exist just 1% standing by three passages, there are intermodal, inland waterway, and airports.
- The table below shows the sales made by a coffee shop in an office building on a typical weekday 11
- the graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 61
- The table below gives information on the proportion of carbohydrates protein and fat in three different diets 68
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 61
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh than disadvantages. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nsport fragment stick up at 10%. Neatly, ports and unknown section be in sameness...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 834.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05454545455 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69341952239 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.0715409619 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6666666667 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164887179797 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756532513771 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0900966340839 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12730115767 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102409757647 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.