The graph below shows the consumption of three spreads from 1981 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The line graph provides the information about three kinds of spreads from 1981 to 2007. And they are margarine, low fat&reduced spreads and butter which are represented in grams.

In general, when the butter owned the highest point during the year of 1986, low flat&reduced spreads acquired the lowest point in the year of 1996.

Firstly, even though margarine was more stable than other kinds of spreads, its consumptions decreased slightly in 1986, approximately, 80 grams. Afterwards, it dropped down sharply up to 40 grams by 2007. Secondly, the butter was able to show incredible reduction from 1981 to 2007 . Namely, 140 grams of butter were consumed in 1981 even if it showed that general consumption of it was only more than 60 harms. Thirdly, low flat &reduced spreads could demonstrate ridiculous improvement in that period. For example, even if the overall consumption of it was about 15 grams, more than 90 grams of it were consumed by 2001. Then, it fell back slightly up to 70 grams

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 283, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...w incredible reduction from 1981 to 2007 . Namely, 140 grams of butter were consum...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, then, third, thirdly, for example, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 838.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9880952381 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70968447837 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595238095238 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5238720914 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.8 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 5.23603664747 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176007302413 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794511607893 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0946111779841 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127972854352 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0886660023336 0.0819641961636 108% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.