The graph below shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000.
The bar chart compares the change of commuting by four different means of transports: train, car, tube, bus in a particular city in Europe over a four-decade period starting from 1960.
Overall, a downward trend was observed for the number of people traveling by bus. However, this was not the case for car usage, which overtook buses usage to become the mainstream transport in Europe.
In 1960, the bus was the most common type of transport for European commuters, with four out of ten people using the bus to reach their work. By contrast, the use of car models was the lowest. In the subsequent two decades, there was a major decrease of 25% in the proportion of bus commuters, 28% in 1980 and 15% in 2000 respectively, making the least popular models in all four categories. Also mirroring the trajectory was the percentage of people using the car for traveling, which rose rapidly to below a quarter in 1980 before reaching its peak at initial bus’s figure.
Regarding the train, its number made significant gains at approximately 28% in 1980 despite also dipping to 21% in 2000. While using the tube was relatively stable, falling from 27% of commuters in 1960 to 22% in 1980, but climbing back to 25% in 2000.
- The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand s population from 1950 to 2050 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The line graph below shows the number of single family homes constructed in the United States by region over a period of six years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting in the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The chart below shows the percentage of the population in the UK who consumed the recommended daily amount of fruit and vegetables in 2002 2006 and 2010 78
- The line graph below gives information about the rates of unemployment between 1991 and 2005 in three different countries in Europe The table shows the percentage of men and women in the workforce in these three countries 73
- The charts below show the Medical research funding amount in millions of Dollars in Someland and also shows the death number for this area 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 393, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... popular models in all four categories. Also mirroring the trajectory was the percen...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1012.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75117370892 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62842043324 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596244131455 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6327919382 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.444444444 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220484869162 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875092906834 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486924816788 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121860610238 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469754964504 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.