The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960 1980 and 2000

Essay topics:

The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000.

The bar chart illustrates that four different transportation modes. Which are used by European people in the years 1960,1980 and 2000.

Overall, it can be manifested that car transport was very popular in the end of the period, when’re as, European people prefer to go outside by walk in the beginning of the time.

Commence with, it is clear evident from the graph that in the 1960 bus transport was at 18%used by people. However, in the same time bike used percentage augmented to 25%. Surprisingly, bus transport was 2% more in used than bike in the 1980, where, bike used only 20%. In the end of the period bus used as transport was 15% and bike at their nominal position.

Secondly, in the 2000 car used by European people was maximum above 35%, at the same time people less interested to go by walk. Before 20 years car used was almost near to a quarter, but by walk was below 20%. In the beginning car used was at their nominal position 5% but same time people interest in walk-in was increase dramatically, it at second highest possible in that time slots.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-05-09 vuhungbo 84 view
2023-05-03 bhatt00 73 view
2023-04-03 tata 67 view
2023-03-26 tata view
2023-01-16 thanhtu000 78 view
Essays by user bhatt00 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 148, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ested to go by walk. Before 20 years car used was almost near to a quarter, but b...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, secondly

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 884.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60416666667 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52040285581 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526041666667 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.7584347099 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202071165623 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111953404905 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833169420219 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168479669123 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137841328483 0.0819641961636 168% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.