The graph below shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000.

Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.

The bar chart illustrates information about the proportion of people who use different types of transport to commute in a European city in 3 years 1960, 1980 and 2000. This report included 4 of the most common transport: train, car, tube and bus

Overall, car transport was increasing remarkably during the given time while the others was decreasing even was fluctuating.

The percentage of travellers who chosen car rose rapidly from nearly 5% to more than 35% in 2000. By contrast, the rate of people who travelled to reach office and return home by bus fall down considerably. From its highest was nearly 40% to its lowest level which was only 15% in 2000.

As the same time, there were some slight fluctuations in change of the rate of commuters. In 1980, the level of people used train hit a peak at more than 25% while the proportion of people chosen tube was declined slightly to its minimum which was only over 20%.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-03 quynhthi2001 78 view
Essays by user quynhthi2001 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 770.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72392638037 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.560995163 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625766871166 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4483335273 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.85714285714 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15158010918 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735769180467 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791072517636 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0967066239237 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0891704243195 0.0819641961636 109% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.