The graph below shows the fertility rate of women of different Gulf Countries from 1990 to 2000.
The chart shows striking changes in the fertility rate of women in six Gulf countries – Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Oman, Qatar, Kuwait and Bahrain between 1990 and 2000.
In the ten year period, there was a decline in the number of births per woman in all countries. The biggest declines were in two countries which had low fertility rates at the start of the decade, Bahrain and the UAE.
Fertility rates vary greatly between the six countries. Oman and Saudi Arabia had the highest rates, with over seven births per woman in 1990. This compared with around 4 births per woman in Bahrain and the UAE, and just 3.75 in Kuwait
By 2000, the rate had fallen below three births per woman in Kuwait, Bahrain and the UAE, with a drop of over 25% in a decade in the UAE. However, in Saudi Arabia and Oman, the rates fell by just 20%, from 7.0 to 5.5.
In summary, there were major decreases in birth rates in all countries, but some countries in the region have double the fertility rate of others.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-10 | eyraen | 67 | view |
| 2020-05-29 | HanhDao1911 | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-24 | fachryadul92 | 67 | view |
| 2018-12-17 | Nguyễn Minh Hưng | 67 | view |
| 2018-07-14 | Lalit verma | 56 | view |
- You rented a car recently but were not satisfied with it Write a letter of complaint to the rental agency In your letter introduce yourself explain what went wrong with the car you rented ask for some form of compensation 70
- Even though globalisation brought benefit to many countries its negative side should Not forgotten To what extent do you agree 79
- Telecommuting is changing the concept of conventional working atmosphere Do you agree 65
- In many countries more and more young people are becoming jobless What problems do you think unemployment will cause to individuals and the society What measures should be taken to reduce the level of unemployment among youngsters 41
- Some people believe that computers are more a hindrance than a help in today's world. Others feel that they are such indispensable tools that they would not be able to live or work without them. In what ways are computers a hindrance? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 821.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.51098901099 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.06544447086 2.65546596893 78% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510989010989 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.2696135195 43.030603864 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.285714286 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26466760519 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130075289926 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109161362217 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167204155882 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100252718532 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.