The graph below shows how money was spent on different forms of entertainment over a five year period Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below shows how money was spent on different forms of entertainment over a five year period.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The graph illustrates the amount of money spent on five different entertainments activities in Asia, Europe and the United States in the years 1995 and 2000.

Overall, The United States was the largest country on entertainments expenditure, while Asia was the least on spending.

Asia has been occupied the lowest stage on the provided activities, as in 1995, people who were going to television about 25 and publishing was around 35, while music, video and Cinema was approximately 30 all together, however this equation has been changed in the year 2000, because all entertainments have experienced a rapid increase from 67 to 110.

When talking about Europe side, in 1995 spending were only 97 for all activities, and it rise into 131 in the year 2000.

Last but not least. The United States was the most significant country in spending on entertainment activities as it was 184 in 1995 and it surged to 257 in the end of the period to be the most country on spending on these entertainment activities.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 55, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'entertainments'' or 'entertainment's'?
Suggestion: entertainments'; entertainment's
...nited States was the largest country on entertainments expenditure, while Asia was the least o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 90, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'rises'?
Suggestion: rises
...were only 97 for all activities, and it rise into 131 in the year 2000. Last but ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, while, talking about

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 853.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98830409357 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92261956813 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573099415205 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 103.94549854 43.030603864 242% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 142.166666667 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157441284771 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827547330099 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707307678823 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0986412851789 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660370508963 0.0819641961636 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.