The graph below shows information about the activities that Australian and New Zealand children enjoy doing the most in 2017.
The bar graph represents the data about recreational activities of the young Australian and New Zealander in 2017. In general, the young in Australia preferred to do outdoor activities while New Zealand children liked participating in indoor activities.
For Australian children, the youths were involved in the most outdoor activities such as going to the park (25%) and sports (above 27%). The proportion of the young playing computer games was as much as that of children enjoying DVDs, just 15%. Art and craft and Books had the least percentage of the participants with around 6% and 10% respectively.
In the other hand, there was a contrasting trend in leisure activities of the children in New Zealand compared to in Australia. The activity having the highest joining rate by the youths was art and craft with 25%. Books and DVDs accounted for the same percentage (about 17%). Finally, the most uncommon activities were traveling to the park and playing sports with 13%.
- The graphs below show a comparison of the weekly expenses in the UK and the US, in 2010 56
- The graph below shows information about the activities that Australian and New Zealand children enjoy doing the most in 2017. 73
- Some believe that students learn better in schools when they study in groups. Others say that student will learn better when they study own.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- The graph below gives information from a report in 2010 about the use of energy in Australia since 1980 with projections until 2030 56
- The graph below shows information about the activities that Australian and New Zealand children enjoy doing the most in 2017. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, while, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 817.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07453416149 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79073513893 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55900621118 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.521988662 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.7777777778 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8888888889 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341334460991 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132262060139 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107491330147 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237689881213 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104815611467 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.