The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010.
The pie chart compares the proportion of money spent on six types of categories in a nation between 1950 and 2010.
Overall, it is clear that the largest expenditure was on housing in 1950 while it was on food in 2010. Additionally, healthcare made up the smallest rate in the amount of household expenditure.
In 1950, the percentage of expenditure on housing was highest, at around 72% while the figure for food was significantly lower, at 11.2%. At the same time, 6.6% of total money spent on education compared to only 4.4%, 3.3% and 2.4% expenditure on other transportation and healthcare respectively.
The amount of money spent on food increased to 34% and became the highest point in 2010. At the same time, there was a growth to 19.2% in the expenditure on others. Meanwhile, there were slight rises in the proportion of spending on other transportation, education and healthcare to 14%, 6.3% and 4.5% respectively. By contrast, the expenditure on housing saw a considerable fall by a half of total money.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-21 | nguyen thanh sang | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-30 | Mostakima Tawrin | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-26 | Sarina2021 | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-26 | Sarina2021 | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-05 | quytnee | 84 | view |
- In the developed world average life expectancy is increasing What problems will this cause for individuals and society Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impacts of ageing populations 56
- The graph shows the information about the number of marriages in the UK from 1951 to 2001
- The graph below shows information about the consumption of different types of fast food per person per week in England between 1980 and 2000 78
- The line graph shows the income of four cafes in New York over last year 78
- The table below gives information about values NZ of the exports of kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five countries between 2010 and 2012 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion compared to only 4.4%, 3.3% and 2.4% expenditure on other transportation and ...
^^
Line 7, column 234, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t rises in the proportion of spending on other transportation, education and heal...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 852.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95348837209 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1007073636 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517441860465 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7054001888 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6666666667 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187380662544 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791811504282 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611024584267 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133736626086 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572489804224 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.