The graph below shows the information about medical care in three Europe countries between 1980 and 2000
The table compares the healthcare facilities of three different regions, namely Austria, France and Sweden which are in Europe from 1980 to 2000.
Overall, it is apparent that healthcare systems have been served with the best services in Sweden, whereas France ranked the last positions with its compared to Austria and Sweden over the period (from 1980 to 2000).
In Austria, the number of doctors witnessed a gradual rose by 0.1 during the 10 periods and continued slightly to 1 per 1000 people in 2000, a contrast to France, the availability of physicians fell to 2.2 and 1.3 from 1980 to 2000. However, the ranked best healthcare services in Sweden at 3.6, but its a slightly decreased to 3 in 1990, after that, it picked up again in 2000 with 3.8 per 1000 people.
In terms of beds aid for patients, Sweden had remained the figures at 6.4, and it then grew gradually by 0.5 per 1000 people from 1980 to 2000, in which, Austria and France have also a significant soared and it’s reached several beds at 3.7 and 1.6 in 2000, respectively. On the other hand, in France, the average stayed of patients saw a remarkable plummet from 9 days to 7 days, the maximum in Sweden at around 20 days during the period given that time. Lastly, Austria has a modesty declined but its turned around at 18 in 2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 302, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...althcare services in Sweden at 3.6, but its a slightly decreased to 3 in 1990, afte...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, lastly, so, then, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1075.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61373390558 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43801757777 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562231759657 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.4278846114 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.571428571 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.2857142857 22.9334400587 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 5.23603664747 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116186177082 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658501201237 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480892984486 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0901884409585 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431353277102 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.36 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.05 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.