The graph below shows information about recruitment of teachers in Ontario between 2001 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the percentage of first - year experience teachers who were recruited into Ontario inters of English and France.
Overall, it is clear that while the proportion of French-language teachers finding jobs increased, the figures for English-language teachers was a rapid decline.
In 2001, the percentage of teachers in both languages was the same, about 70% within English and 75% within French. After three years, there was a dramatic decrease of the rate of english-language teachers finding jobs by over 30%, at 40% while the figures for France fluctuated, fell to just over 50% in 2002, and went up approximately 70% in 2003.
In the next following four year, the proportion of teachers teaching French rose marginally, from just below 70% in 2003 to reached a peak at 75% in 2007. There was an opposite tendency with the percentage of English-language teachers. This figure saw a modest growth in 2005. After that a sharp decline was seen in this figure in 2007, hitting the lowest point at 25%. At this number, the figures for French were three times as much as that of English.
- In some countries around the world men and women are having children late in life What are the reasons for this development What are the effects on society and family life 78
- The graph below shows information about recruitment of teachers in Ontario between 2001 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e proportion of French-language teachers finding jobs increased, the figures for ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 927.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98387096774 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9384333343 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586021505376 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9464755311 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.33333333333 5.23603664747 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0920365459391 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0418344442614 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406354264186 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.068031434497 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291152787314 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e proportion of French-language teachers finding jobs increased, the figures for ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 927.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98387096774 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9384333343 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586021505376 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9464755311 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.33333333333 5.23603664747 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0920365459391 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0418344442614 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406354264186 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.068031434497 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291152787314 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.