Some scientists think that there are intelligent life forms on other planets and messages should be sent to contact them . Other scientists think it is a bad idea and would be dangerous . Discuss both views and give your own opinion .
The universe is vast and might be full of multiple life - forms. Some researchers believe that humanity should try to contact these life - forms, however, many believe that this should be avoided as it could lead to detrimental consequences. This essay will explain both these views and elaborate on why the latter is an ideal choice.
There are some motivating factors behind scientists trying to communicate with aliens. To begin with, the humans might be able to make friends on different planets and learn about their life. This could lead to knowledge being transferred which might result in cure of multiple diseases and problems. This has been seen in various Bollywood and Hollywood movies . Furthermore, while trying to build technologies to get in touch with other pologi species of the universe, the technologists might be able to come up with innovations that solve major problems of the society. For instance, a new protocol might get developed that might end up making the Internet faster. These reasons make it an exciting task to communicate with extra - terrestrial beings.
On the other hand, there are some dangers associated to the activity as well. Firstly, the whole research is very expensive and requires a lot of tax payer's money which can be utilised on making the lives of humans better. For instance, rather than spending a billion dollars trying to contact people on Mars, the government can build better hospitals and schools for individuals on earth. Secondly, this activity of contacting aliens can result in celestial wars. The earth might get attacked for the various resources that it has which might lead to poor quality of life for homo - sapiens. Because all these reasons, it is recommended not to carry out this endeavour
This essay has described the benefits and drawbacks of trying to communicate with universal life forms. However, it is evident that the risk attached to the process is high and hence, it should be avoided.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-06-04 | Phương Trinh | 61 | view |
2022-10-27 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
2022-10-26 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
2022-08-06 | Guri473812 | 56 | view |
2022-03-30 | solaz1 | 84 | view |
- Some people think that schools should select students only according to their academic abilities while others believe that it is better to consider students other abilities Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- The chart below shows the proportion of people who ate at least five portions of Fruit and Vegetables per day in Canada from 2001 to 2010 84
- In many countries schools have severe problems with student behavior What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 89
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European county between 1979 and 2004
- Some people say that e books and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspaper and magazines to what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this life' or 'these lives'?
Suggestion: this life; these lives
...eve that humanity should try to contact these life - forms, however, many believe that thi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 362, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...n various Bollywood and Hollywood movies . Furthermore, while trying to build tech...
^^
Line 5, column 670, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ommended not to carry out this endeavour This essay has described the benefits an...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1648.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07076923077 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62932533149 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5685833289 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9411764706 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1176470588 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64705882353 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160642444149 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557293968818 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454772034885 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10296188704 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310228725527 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.