The graph below shows information on employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005.
Summarise the information by choosing and describe the main idea, and make comparisons where appropriate.
The bar chart provides information regarding the percentage of employment in Australia, Switzerland, Iceland, New Zealand, UK, and USA over the period of 1995 to 2005.
Overall, it is obvious that over this time frame, employment rate of male was higher than that of female. Besides, 2005 witnessed a considerable increase of people who had a job compared to the figures in 1995. It is noticeable that Switzerland and Iceland had the highest number of employment over 10-year period.
Look at the information in more detail, we can see that in 1995, male employment reached the biggest rate in Iceland (70%), followed by Switzerland (65%) while New Zealand and USA had nearly the same employment rate at 60%. The lowest rate of male employment in 1995 is Australia and UK, with only 55%. Female employment rate experienced a little bit different trend in 1995 when the highest rate is Switzerland at 55%, the second position is UK at 50%, followed by USA (45%), Iceland (40%), Australia (28%), and New Zealand (27%).
Positively, in 2005, the percentage of employment of male was the highest in Switzerland and Iceland, with 82% and 78%, respectively while the other four countries was at a similar rate of approximately 70%. About employment rate of female in 2005, Switzerland was still at the biggest number of 68%. The lower rates was female employment in UK, Iceland, USA, and NZ and the lowest employment rate of female was Australia at 38%.
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement. 89
- The graph below shows information on employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005. Summarise the information by choosing and describe the main idea, and make comparisons where appropriate. 67
- More and more people are relying on the private car at their major meant of transportation. Describe some of the problems over-reliance on cars can cause, and suggest at least one possible solution. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...%. Female employment rate experienced a little bit different trend in 1995 when the highes...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, look, regarding, second, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1199.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91393442623 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81903764783 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475409836066 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 358.2 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9037805832 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.9 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18541345383 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0947536775963 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341918667118 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129682492823 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024291043783 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.