The graph below shows the information on waste disposal in a European country from 2005 to 2008.
The bar graph illustrates the data about three different methods of disposal in a European country from 2005 to 2008 the data is described in a million tonnes
Overall, There was an upward trend in the dumping method; however, there was a lower trend on landfill method; damping in sea fluctuated through the year
Dumping in the sea stood at around eleven hundred million tones in 2005, which then increased noticeably by approximately 3000 million tones after one year. After being increased, 2008 experienced a slight growth to above 1600 million tonners in a dumping method
The landfill method saw an enormous decrease during the three years. In a European country mostly used method was landfill during the first year (2005), while the figure declined dramatically to 1600 million tonnes and again the data decreased remarkably by 4000 million tonnes in 2005
On the contrary, the burning method fluctuated throughout the year which was the least used method in every year
- There is an increasing amount of advertising directed at children which encourages them to buy goods such as toys and snacks Many parents are worried that these advertisements put too much pressure on children while some advertisers claim that they provid 56
- Some people think that money is the most essential factor in promoting happiness Do you think people can be happy without much money What other factors contribute towards happiness 61
- Some young people believe it s best to move out of their hometowns when they become adults while others wish to live in their hometowns their whole lives Discuss both sides and give your opinion 89
- Some people think that when a person travels into a different culture they should adapt to the local practices and customs To what extent do you agree 73
- Feedback and evaluation are necessary aspects of school and work but many people dislike being evaluated What are the causes of this problem How could it be solved 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, then, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 832.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16770186335 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51788096376 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546583850932 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 3.0 8.94146341463 34% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 53.0 22.4926829268 236% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 121.672602595 43.030603864 283% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 277.333333333 112.824112599 246% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 53.6666666667 22.9334400587 234% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 16.0 5.23603664747 306% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141514784983 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0943875768722 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544380244088 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0923274659631 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118011235651 0.0819641961636 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 29.8 13.2329268293 225% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 61.2550243902 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 22.8 10.3012195122 221% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 27.5 11.4329268293 241% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 23.2 10.9970731707 211% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 23.0 11.0658536585 208% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.