The graph below shows Long-Term International Migration in UK, 1999-2008. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The provided graph illustrates the number of people shifted in UK between 1999 to 2008. Units are counted by thousand.

In 1999 , above 150 thousand of human started to migrate from UK. Then, they remain steadily from 2000 to 2003. (Ranging from above 150 to nearly 200 thousand.) After one year there is sharply raised just under the 250 thousand. Likewise, in 2005 and 2006 it is steadily decrease comparing to 2004. The migration population had upsurge by around 17 thousand in the end period of time.

In term of immigration, about 450 thousand people are involved where 3000 thousand of people are from emigration in 1999. There is slight soar in both between 2000 to 2003. The immigration peaked up nearly 6000 thousand and remain constant until the end of the period. However, emigration had slight decline in 2005 and it has fluctuations up to end of the period.

Overall, immigration made up the highest number of people . In contrast emigration made up the least number of human.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nits are counted by thousand. In 1999 , above 150 thousand of human started to ...
^^
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... from above 150 to nearly 200 thousand. After one year there is sharply raised just u...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'decreased'.
Suggestion: decreased
...kewise, in 2005 and 2006 it is steadily decrease comparing to 2004. The migration popula...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 327, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'upsurged'.
Suggestion: upsurged
...g to 2004. The migration population had upsurge by around 17 thousand in the end period...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 327, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'upsurged'.
Suggestion: upsurged
...g to 2004. The migration population had upsurge by around 17 thousand in the end period...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...psurge by around 17 thousand in the end period of time. In term of immigration, about 450 t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 366, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s fluctuations up to end of the period. Overall, immigration made up the highest...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 58, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ion made up the highest number of people . In contrast emigration made up the lea...
^^
Line 7, column 65, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...e up the highest number of people . In contrast emigration made up the least number of ...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, likewise, so, then, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 826.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8875739645 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53993782519 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556213017751 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.7324586134 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 59.0 112.824112599 52% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.0714285714 22.9334400587 53% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0848052981269 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0300775499144 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542286252548 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0614054011869 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051939562375 0.0819641961636 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.6 13.2329268293 57% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.22 61.2550243902 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.19 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.4329268293 44% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.