The table below gives the information about rail transport in four countries in 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.

The supplied table illustrates the comparison of rail transport in 2007 of four countries namely united kingdom,united state of america,Japan and Italy.
According to the table,the Japan had the highest percentage (27%)of people utilizing the rail transport excluding metro. It carries 1980 of passenger per kilometers and 23,01 billions of tons were carried out in the mean time. Then, united kingdom have 5,9%of people using the rail facilities and 770 passenger are involved per kilometers where they carried 22.2 billions of tons cargo. Likewise, in united state of America it had 0.3% of people use rail transport then 80 passenger in kilometer per head of pupil and it carried out 2,820 billion of tons cargo. Italy had 5.5%of people utilizing the rail transport excluding metro and it carries 780 of people per head of population and they carry 21.9 billon s of tons cargo during this year.
Overall, Japan had the most and united state of America had the least people utilizing the rail transport excluding the metro system .In contrast USA carried the highest cargo where Italy carried out lowest.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , united
... of four countries namely united kingdom,united state of america,Japan and Italy. Acco...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Japan
...y united kingdom,united state of america,Japan and Italy. According to the table,the ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 23, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...Japan and Italy. According to the table,the Japan had the highest percentage 27%of ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 170, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '01 billion'.
Suggestion: 01 billion
...1980 of passenger per kilometers and 23,01 billions of tons were carried out in the mean time....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 299, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'passenger' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'passengers'.
Suggestion: passengers
...eople using the rail facilities and 770 passenger are involved per kilometers where they ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 359, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '2 billion'.
Suggestion: 2 billion
...ed per kilometers where they carried 22.2 billions of tons cargo. Likewise, in united state o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 471, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'passenger' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'passengers'.
Suggestion: passengers
...3% of people use rail transport then 80 passenger in kilometer per head of pupil and it c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ail transport excluding the metro system .In contrast USA carried the highest carg...
^^
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...l transport excluding the metro system .In contrast USA carried the highest cargo ...
^^
Line 3, column 137, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...ransport excluding the metro system .In contrast USA carried the highest cargo where Ita...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
likewise, so, then, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 926.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11602209945 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54615224263 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497237569061 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.988557076 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.285714286 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108547248373 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676883241152 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607294518763 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110231786099 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0696504107942 0.0819641961636 85% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.