The supplied table depicts the percentage of goods used in plethora States namely Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Turkey in the year 2002.
As is presented in the table chart, Turkey had invested the large sum of amount about 32% in food, drink and tobacco. Likewise, other four countries also extended in these items. In food,drink and tobacco Ireland had accounted nearly 29% and Italy had above 16% in these item. Similarly, Sweden had the least percent about 15% and approximately 19% of food, drinks and tobacco are expended by spain.
In clothing and footwear Italy had highestly invested by 9%. Sweden had the lowest below 6%. The three state Ireland, Spain and Turkey had exepend the money in steadily way 6.43%, 6.51 and 6.63% respectively. Turkey had the highest expenditure in leisure and education by 4.35% and Spain had the least expenditure by nearly 2%. About 3% are invested in Sweden . similarly Italy also invested more than 3% in leisure and education. In contrast, under 3% Ireland wasted the money in education and leisure.
Overall. Food, drinks and tobacco contributed the must to the customers. In contrast, leisure and education contributed the least to the consumer.
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 56
- the table below gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 11
- the table below shows the television viewer figures for sports by country, in million 67
- The table below gives the information about rail transport in four countries in 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 67
- IELTS Task 1 - Tables give information about sales of fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of goods used in plethora States namely Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Turkey...
^^
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , drink
...es also extended in these items. In food,drink and tobacco Ireland had accounted nearl...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 35, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n. In clothing and footwear Italy had highestly invested by 9%. Sweden had the...
^^
Line 5, column 361, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...arly 2%. About 3% are invested in Sweden . similarly Italy also invested more than...
^^
Line 5, column 364, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Similarly
...y 2%. About 3% are invested in Sweden . similarly Italy also invested more than 3% in lei...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 364, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: similarly,
...y 2%. About 3% are invested in Sweden . similarly Italy also invested more than 3% in lei...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, likewise, similarly, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1006.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10659898477 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56030221535 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522842639594 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3201079205 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.8571428571 112.824112599 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0714285714 22.9334400587 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.35714285714 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0709475331572 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0298692153476 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0326168324422 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0437849671476 0.15604864568 28% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031823291103 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.3012195122 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.