The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by theTourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the

Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.

The given line graph shows amount of enquiries which sent to tourist information office by telephone , letter or email and or by person between january until june in a year 2011.

It is clear that although in first month of year enquiries recvied in a person was lower than other opportunities , which sending enquiries by telephone was popular way but at end of graph the trend for in person overtook other figures.

In January number of enquiries recvied by 3 different ways was lower than 1000 , furthermore  after month number of enquiries received by telephone saw considerable decline although enquiries which sent by email or letter remaind fairly stabe for 3 monthes at 700 , moreover acoording to graph for the rest of month number of enquiries reached to  tourism post office by person sharply rose from approximately 400 at first month to over than 1800 at end of graph , Although sending enquiries by email was second popular way but at the end declined to under 400. According to graph figure for telephone enquiries witnessed stability and decline but for the end graph numbers experienced growth to 1600 enquiries.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-17 kingdangyeu0606 78 view
2019-12-27 Maleeha 67 view
2019-12-18 lunanguyen0701 84 view
2019-12-15 KIM JINUK 56 view
2019-12-14 rohitbangari27@gmail.com 67 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... tourist information office by telephone , letter or email and or by person betwee...
^^
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...erson was lower than other opportunities , which sending enquiries by telephone wa...
^^
Line 9, column 79, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... by 3 different ways was lower than 1000 , furthermore  after month number of enqu...
^^
Line 9, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t ways was lower than 1000 , furthermore  after month number of enquiries received...
^^
Line 9, column 264, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...emaind fairly stabe for 3 monthes at 700 , moreover acoording to graph for the res...
^^
Line 9, column 347, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of month number of enquiries reached to  tourism post office by person sharply ro...
^^
Line 9, column 463, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... month to over than 1800 at end of graph , Although sending enquiries by email was...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 949.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04787234043 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68553776307 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510638297872 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 47.0 22.4926829268 209% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 165.515105051 43.030603864 385% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 237.25 112.824112599 210% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 47.0 22.9334400587 205% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 12.25 5.23603664747 234% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256064204696 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160258034181 0.103423049105 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544682015365 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174748178645 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610530503857 0.0819641961636 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 25.9 13.2329268293 196% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.23 61.2550243902 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.4 10.3012195122 198% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.9 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 20.8 10.9970731707 189% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.