The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.

The Line graph gives information about how the people delivered questions in one city within the first semester of the year and specific questions about tourism.
We are able to see that these people could answer the enquiries by telephone, by letter or email and in person. First of all, at the beginning of the year, the most popular way to give an answer was by telephone, five hundred more than in person. Secondly, in February all the communication start to change and the difference between three kinds of answering was one hundred. The big transformation was in June, the last month of the research, answers by letter or email were the least wanted with a huge difference from the most wanted that was in person.
According to the line graph, the preference changed during the months, so started in January with the choice by telephone and in June the most popular method was in person.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-17 kingdangyeu0606 78 view
2019-12-27 Maleeha 67 view
2019-12-18 lunanguyen0701 84 view
2019-12-15 KIM JINUK 56 view
2019-12-14 rohitbangari27@gmail.com 67 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the most popular method was in person.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, so, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 744.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76923076923 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54647788885 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.9443825785 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 124.0 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0820059755217 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411099454535 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03649993556 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0620825049351 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396398237602 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.