The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.You should writ

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

You should write at least 150 words.

The graph illustrates how the Tourist Information Office received inquiries in the first haft of 2011.

Overall, there were much more inquiries demanded directly or through phone calls as the figures for these both ways exhibited positive growth while asking for information via letter saw a decline.

The number of inquiries made in person started at just above 400 in January. However, in the first quarter, it experienced a swell to 1000, marking the moment when demanding inquiries directly started becoming the most popular. By the end of the given period, the office got roughly 1900 inquiries in person.

The figure for telephone inquiries dropped by 100, hitting a trough at 800 in February before rebounding to 1000 in March. After one month of stability, it accelerated to 1600 within the second quarter of 2011.

The number of inquiry letters fell slightly from shy of 800 to around 700 in the first two months. Following this, there was a sharp downward trend from March to May before the figure held steady at just below 400 in the last month.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-27 Maleeha 67 view
2019-12-15 KIM JINUK 56 view
2019-11-15 SandraWolfie 84 view
2019-08-26 Nguyễn Hương Giang 78 view
2019-08-26 Minhthuminhthumingthu 67 view
Essays by user Nguyễn Hương Giang :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, may, second, so, well, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03351955307 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47505579515 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648044692737 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.724197291 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.111111111 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125703500227 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598497868283 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705278996751 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0854848232766 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0788680908931 0.0819641961636 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.